Brussels Securities (Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States - Judgment) [2019] EUECJ C-389/18 (19 December 2019)
Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435 precludes national legislation that requires dividends received by a parent company from its subsidiary to be included in the tax base before a 95% deduction, with any surplus carried forward indefinitely, and that deduction having priority over another tax deduction (such as DRC) that may only be carried forward for a limited time, as this may result in the loss of a tax advantage and indirect taxation of the dividends, contrary to the directive's objective of tax neutrality.
- Citation
- [2019] EUECJ C-389/18
- Parties
- Applicant: Brussels Securities NV; Respondent: Belgian State
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling: Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435 precludes such national legislation.
- Legal Topics
- Parent Subsidiary Directive, Corporate Taxation, Dividend Exemption, Order of Tax Deductions, Double Taxation Avoidance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brussels Securities NV
Applicant
Belgian State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference for Interpretation) / Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435 precludes national legislation requiring dividends received by a parent company to be included in the tax base before a 95% deduction, with priority over other deductions that are time-limited.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435 precludes national legislation that requires dividends received by a parent company from its subsidiary to be included in the tax base before a 95% deduction, with any surplus carried forward indefinitely, and that deduction having priority over another tax deduction (such as DRC) that may only be carried forward for a limited time, as this may result in the loss of a tax advantage and indirect taxation of the dividends, contrary to the directive's objective of tax neutrality.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling: Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435 precludes such national legislation.
Orders
- Article 4(1) of Directive 90/435/EEC, as amended, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that dividends received by a parent company from its subsidiary must first be included in the tax base of the parent company, before 95% of the amount of the dividends is then deducted,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment