Calvin Williams v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. [1997] EUECJ C-156/96P (21 January 1997)

Calvin Williams v Court of Auditors of the European Communities. [1997] EUECJ C-156/96P (21 January 1997)

Uttering serious public insults by an official is sufficient to infringe Article 12 of the Staff Regulations, and the lawfulness of disciplinary measures does not depend on whether the conduct constitutes criminal defamation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] EUECJ C-156/96P
Parties
Appellant: Calvin Williams; Respondent: Court of Auditors of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Order
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Officials' Rights and Obligations, Disciplinary Proceedings, Duty of Loyalty, Acts Incompatible With Office, Removal From Post
European Union Law Employment Law Officials' Rights and Obligations Disciplinary Proceedings Duty of Loyalty Acts Incompatible With Office Removal From Post

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Calvin Williams

Appellant

Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Order

  1. 1 Whether uttering serious public insults by an official constitutes an act incompatible with the dignity of office under Article 12 of the Staff Regulations
  2. 2 Whether the Court of First Instance must assess if the conduct amounts to criminal defamation when reviewing disciplinary measures

Ratio Decidendi

Uttering serious public insults by an official is sufficient to infringe Article 12 of the Staff Regulations, and the lawfulness of disciplinary measures does not depend on whether the conduct constitutes criminal defamation.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed