Christiane Chvatal & Ors v Court of Justice of the European Communities. (Officials) [1998] EUECJ T-154/96 (30 September 1998)

Christiane Chvatal & Ors v Court of Justice of the European Communities. (Officials) [1998] EUECJ T-154/96 (30 September 1998)

The Court found that the termination of service and the contested regulation complied with legal and procedural requirements, and there was no infringement of equal treatment or essential procedural safeguards.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] EUECJ T-154/96
Parties
Applicant: Christiane Chvatal and others; Respondent: Court of Justice of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Termination of Service, Accession of New Member States, Act Adversely Affecting an Official, Objection of Illegality, Equal Treatment, Procedural Requirements, Consultation of Institutions, Staff Regulations Committee
European Union Law Employment Law Termination of Service Accession of New Member States Act Adversely Affecting an Official Objection of Illegality Equal Treatment Procedural Requirements +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christiane Chvatal and others

Applicant

Court of Justice of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of service of officials due to accession of new Member States was lawful
  2. 2 Whether Regulation (EC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2688/95 was legal
  3. 3 Whether there was infringement of equal treatment and essential procedural requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the termination of service and the contested regulation complied with legal and procedural requirements, and there was no infringement of equal treatment or essential procedural safeguards.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.