Pevasa v Commission (Agriculture) [1998] EUECJ C-199/94P (05 March 1998)

Pevasa v Commission (Agriculture) [1998] EUECJ C-199/94P (05 March 1998)

None of the facts relied upon by the applicant were new or decisive within the meaning of Article 41 of the EC Statute; therefore, the application for revision is inadmissible.

Citation
[1998] EUECJ C-199/94P
Parties
Applicant for Revision: CompaÄnia Internacional de Pesca y Derivados SA (Inpesca); Supporting Party: Pevasa; Respondent: Commission
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
05 March 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Revision / Final Judgment on Admissibility
Outcome
application for revision dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Revision of Judgments, Admissibility, Community Financial Aid, Procedural Rules
European Union Law Administrative Law Revision of Judgments Admissibility Community Financial Aid Procedural Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CompaÄnia Internacional de Pesca y Derivados SA (Inpesca)

Applicant for Revision

Pevasa

Supporting Party

Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Revision / Final Judgment on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether new and decisive facts justify revision of the order of the Court of Justice
  2. 2 Admissibility of application for revision under Article 41 of the EC Statute

Ratio Decidendi

None of the facts relied upon by the applicant were new or decisive within the meaning of Article 41 of the EC Statute; therefore, the application for revision is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • Inpesca to pay the costs
  • Pevasa to bear its own costs