Commission of the European Communities v Council of the EC. [1989] EUECJ C-275/87 (2 February 1989)

Commission of the European Communities v Council of the EC. [1989] EUECJ C-275/87 (2 February 1989)

The Court held that Article 235 could not be used as the legal basis for the regulation because Articles 28 and 113 provided sufficient authority. The regulation's provisions on the use of containers in internal traffic were an essential part of the temporary importation arrangements and could not be separated from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1989] EUECJ C-275/87
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Defendant: Council of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Action for Annulment / Judgment
Outcome
Regulation declared void; effects maintained until replacement measures adopted; Council to pay costs
Legal Topics
Temporary Importation of Containers, Legal Basis for EU Regulations, Scope of Article 235 EEC Treaty
European Union Law Administrative Law Temporary Importation of Containers Legal Basis for EU Regulations Scope of Article 235 EEC Treaty

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commission of the European Communities

Applicant

Council of the European Communities

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Action for Annulment / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Council Regulation No 2096/87 was lawfully adopted on the basis of Article 235 EEC Treaty
  2. 2 Whether other Treaty provisions provided sufficient legal basis for the regulation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that Article 235 could not be used as the legal basis for the regulation because Articles 28 and 113 provided sufficient authority. The regulation's provisions on the use of containers in internal traffic were an essential part of the temporary importation arrangements and could not be separated from the main regulation, thus Article 235 was not justified.

Court Disposition

Regulation declared void; effects maintained until replacement measures adopted; Council to pay costs

Orders

  • Council Regulation No 2096/87 declared void
  • Effects of the regulation to continue until replacement measures enter into force