Commission v France (Approximation of laws) [2001] EUECJ C-219/99 (14 February 2001)

Commission v France (Approximation of laws) [2001] EUECJ C-219/99 (14 February 2001)

Directive 95/16/EC was not transposed by France within the prescribed period, constituting a failure to fulfil obligations under the directive.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] EUECJ C-219/99
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: French Republic
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Treaty Infringement Action / Final Judgment
Outcome
Declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; order to pay costs
Legal Topics
Failure to Fulfil Obligations, Directive Transposition, Safety Standards for Lifts
European Union Law Administrative Law Failure to Fulfil Obligations Directive Transposition Safety Standards for Lifts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commission of the European Communities

Applicant

French Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Treaty Infringement Action / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the French Republic failed to transpose Directive 95/16/EC within the prescribed period

Ratio Decidendi

Directive 95/16/EC was not transposed by France within the prescribed period, constituting a failure to fulfil obligations under the directive.

Court Disposition

Declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; order to pay costs

Orders

  • Declares that France failed to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 95/16/EC.
  • Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.