Commission of the European Communities v French Republic. [1997] EUECJ C-312/96 (29 May 1997)
The French Republic failed to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 93/36/EEC, thus failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 34(1) of the directive.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] EUECJ C-312/96
- Parties
- Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: French Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Transpose Directive, Public Procurement, Member State Obligations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commission of the European Communities
Applicant
French Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the French Republic failed to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 93/36/EEC
- 2 Whether the French Republic failed to inform the Commission of the adoption of such measures
Ratio Decidendi
The French Republic failed to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 93/36/EEC, thus failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 34(1) of the directive.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 34(1) of Directive 93/36/EEC.
- The French Republic is ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment 1 By application lodged at the Court Registry on 24 September 1996, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 1) and, in the alternative, by failing to inform the Commission forthwith of the adoption of such measures, the French Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive and in particular Article 34 thereof. 2 The first paragraph of Article 34(1) of Directive 93/36 provides that Member States are to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive before 14 June 1994 and immediately inform the Commission thereof. 3 On 9 August 1994, having received no notification from the French Government of measures transposing Directive 93/36, the Commission gave the Government formal notice to submit its observations within two months, pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 169 of the Treaty. 4 Having received no reply, the Commission addressed a reasoned opinion to the French Government on 10 May 1995, requiring it to adopt the necessary measures within two months of the date of notification. 5 By letter of 17 August 1995, the French authorities informed the Commission that a bill had been laid before the Senate. 6 Having received no information to the effect that the legislative process had been completed, the Commission brought the present action. 7 The French Republic does not deny the failure to fulfil its obligations and merely states that, in order to remedy the situation, a bill together with implementing decrees will be adopted shortly. 8 Since Directive 93/36 has not been transposed within the period prescribed therein, the Commission's action must be held to be well founded. 9 The Court therefore finds that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 93/36, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 34(1) of that directive. Costs 10 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the French Republic has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) hereby: 1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 34(1) of that directive; 2. Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII