Commission v Luxembourg (Social policy) [1998] EUECJ C-410/97 (29 October 1998)
By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 92/29/EEC, Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] EUECJ C-410/97
- Parties
- Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Proceedings Under Article 169 EC Treaty / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; costs awarded against Luxembourg.
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Transpose EU Directive, Member State Obligations, Minimum Safety and Health Requirements on Vessels
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commission of the European Communities
Applicant
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings Under Article 169 EC Treaty / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Luxembourg failed to adopt necessary measures to transpose Council Directive 92/29/EEC within the prescribed period
Ratio Decidendi
By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 92/29/EEC, Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive.
Court Disposition
Application granted; declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; costs awarded against Luxembourg.
Orders
- Declares that Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 92/29/EEC by not adopting necessary measures within the prescribed period.
- Orders Luxembourg to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment By application lodged at the Court Registry on 5 December 1997, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/29/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels (OJ 1992 L 113, p. 19, hereinafter 'the Directive'), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. Under the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of the Directive, Member States were to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply therewith by 31 December 1994 and immediately inform the Commission thereof. Since it had not received any notification concerning the transposition of the Directive into Luxembourg law, the Commission initiated the procedure provided for in Article 169 of the Treaty by sending the Luxembourg Government a letter of formal notice on 16 May 1995. By letter of 12 September 1996 the Luxembourg Government informed the Commission that the measures necessary for transposing the Directive were being prepared. Having received no communication of any definitive text adopted, the Commission on 16 December 1996 sent a reasoned opinion to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, calling upon it to adopt the necessary measures within two months of its notification. By letter of 23 January 1997 the Luxembourg Government informed the Commission that a draft regulation was being adopted. Having received no information to the effect that transposition had been completed, the Commission brought the present action. In its defence, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg admits not having fulfilled its obligation to transpose the Directive. It points out, however, that a draft law transposing the Directive is being prepared and is due to be submitted to the Government in Council before mid-March 1998. Since the transposition of the Directive has not been achieved within the period prescribed therein, the action brought by the Commission in this connection must be held to be well founded. It must therefore be held that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations thereunder. Costs 11. Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party's pleadings. Since the Commission has applied for costs to be awarded against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the latter has been unsuccessful, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) hereby: 1. Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 92/29/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations thereunder. 2. Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. Kapteyn Ragnemalm Ioannou Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 29 October 1998. R. Grass P. J. G. Kapteyn Registrar President of the Fourth Chamber 1: Language of the case: French. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII