Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. (Member States) [1992] EUECJ C-270/91 (8 July 1992)
Italy failed to adopt and notify the necessary measures to implement the directives within the prescribed periods, thereby breaching its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1992] EUECJ C-270/91
- Parties
- Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: Italian Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Transpose Directives, Obligations of Member States, Notification of Implementing Measures
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commission of the European Communities
Applicant
Italian Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Italy failed to notify or adopt measures to implement Commission Directive 89/321/EEC and Council Directive 89/360/EEC within the prescribed periods
Ratio Decidendi
Italy failed to adopt and notify the necessary measures to implement the directives within the prescribed periods, thereby breaching its obligations under the EEC Treaty.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Declaration that Italy failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty by not implementing the directives within the prescribed period
- Italy ordered to pay the costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment 1 By application lodged at the Court Registry on 15 October 1991, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that, by failing to notify to the Commission the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to fulfil the obligations imposed on it by Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine (OJ 1989 L 133, p. 33) and Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine (OJ 1989 L 153, p. 29) or by failing to adopt the necessary measures to comply with those directives by the prescribed dates, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty. 2 Under Article 2 of Directives 89/321 and 89/360, the Member States are required to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with those directives by not later than 1 September 1989 and 1 October 1989 respectively, and to inform the Commission thereof forthwith. 3 Since the Italian Republic had not within the prescribed period made the requisite notification concerning the transposition into domestic law of the two abovementioned directives, the Commission brought an action under Article 169 of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that Italy had failed to fulfil its obligations. The letter before action of 26 June 1990 and the reasoned opinion of 18 March 1991 addressed by the Commission to the Italian Republic remained unanswered. 4 Reference is made to the Report for the Hearing for a fuller account of the facts of the case, the procedure and the pleas and arguments of the parties, which are mentioned or discussed hereinafter only in so far as is necessary for the reasoning of the Court. 5 The Commission submits that owing to the mandatory nature of directives the Member States are obliged to comply with them within the periods prescribed. Furthermore, a Member State may be considered to have complied with all its obligations under a directive only when all the provisions of that directive expressly form part of its legislation. 6 The Italian Republic acknowledges that the directives in question have not been fully transposed within the Italian legal system, but gives no further particulars. It points out that certain decrees to be adopted could remedy the default. 7 Under those conditions, it must be held that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine, and with Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty. Costs 8 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Italian Republic has failed in its submissions, it must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, THE COURT hereby: 1. Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Commission Directive 89/321/EEC of 27 April 1989 amending for the second time the Annexes to Council Directive 77/96/EEC on the examination for Trichinae (Trichinelle spiralis) upon importation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine, and with Council Directive 89/360/EEC of 30 May 1989 amending Directive 64/432/EEC as regards administrative areas and a cessation of serological testing for brucellosis in certain types of swine, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty. 2. Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII