Commission v Italy (Approximation of laws) [2002] EUECJ C-365/00 (07 March 2002)

Commission v Italy (Approximation of laws) [2002] EUECJ C-365/00 (07 March 2002)

By enacting and maintaining Article 28 of Law No 128/98, Italy imposed a labelling requirement not provided for by Directive 76/768/EEC, thereby failing to fulfil its obligations under EU law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] EUECJ C-365/00
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: Italian Republic
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings Under Article 226 EC / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the applicant; infringement declared.
Legal Topics
Free Movement of Goods, Harmonisation of Laws, Cosmetic Products, Labelling Requirements
European Union Law Administrative Law Free Movement of Goods Harmonisation of Laws Cosmetic Products Labelling Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commission of the European Communities

Applicant

Italian Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Infringement Proceedings Under Article 226 EC / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Article 28 of Law No 128/98, requiring cosmetic product labels to state whether perfume essences or fragrances are of natural or artificial origin, is compatible with Directive 76/768/EEC, specifically Article 6(1)(g)

Ratio Decidendi

By enacting and maintaining Article 28 of Law No 128/98, Italy imposed a labelling requirement not provided for by Directive 76/768/EEC, thereby failing to fulfil its obligations under EU law.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the applicant; infringement declared.

Orders

  • The Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the third subparagraph of Article 6(1)(g) of Directive 76/768/EEC.
  • The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.