Commission v Belgium (Transport) [1998] EUECJ C-368/97 (14 May 1998)

Commission v Belgium (Transport) [1998] EUECJ C-368/97 (14 May 1998)

Belgium failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of Directive 94/57/EC by not adopting the necessary transposing measures within the prescribed period.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] EUECJ C-368/97
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: Kingdom of Belgium
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
Declaration of infringement and order for costs
Legal Topics
Failure to Transpose EU Directive, Obligations of Member States, Ship Inspection and Survey Organisations
European Union Law Administrative Law Failure to Transpose EU Directive Obligations of Member States Ship Inspection and Survey Organisations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commission of the European Communities

Applicant

Kingdom of Belgium

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Belgium failed to adopt laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 94/57/EC within the prescribed period

Ratio Decidendi

Belgium failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of Directive 94/57/EC by not adopting the necessary transposing measures within the prescribed period.

Court Disposition

Declaration of infringement and order for costs

Orders

  • Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(1) of Directive 94/57/EC.
  • Belgium is ordered to pay the costs.