Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. (Member States) [1994] EUECJ C-65/94 (28 September 1994)
Belgium failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of Directive 90/167/EEC by not bringing into force or communicating the necessary measures within the prescribed period.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1994] EUECJ C-65/94
- Parties
- Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: Kingdom of Belgium
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Proceedings Under Article 169 EC Treaty / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; costs awarded against Belgium.
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Transpose Directive, Obligations of Member States, Medicated Feedingstuffs, Implementation of EU Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commission of the European Communities
Applicant
Kingdom of Belgium
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings Under Article 169 EC Treaty / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Belgium failed to transpose Directive 90/167/EEC within the prescribed period
- 2 Whether Belgium failed to communicate the necessary measures to the Commission
Ratio Decidendi
Belgium failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of Directive 90/167/EEC by not bringing into force or communicating the necessary measures within the prescribed period.
Court Disposition
Application granted; declaration of failure to fulfil obligations; costs awarded against Belgium.
Orders
- Belgium declared to have failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of Directive 90/167/EEC.
- Belgium ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment 1 By application lodged at the Court Registry on 15 February 1994, the Commission of the European Communities brought an action under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for a declaration by the Court that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community (OJ 1990 L 92, p. 42), apart from Article 11(2), and/or by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the said directive and Articles 5 and 189 of the EC Treaty. 2 Article 15 of the directive provides: "Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply ° with the requirements of Article 11(2) on the date on which they must conform with the Community rules on the protection of feedingstuffs against pathogenic agents, but at the latest by 31 December 1992, ° before 1 October 1991, with the other provisions of this Directive. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof." 3 The Kingdom of Belgium does not deny its failure to transpose the directive within the prescribed period. It merely states that a draft Royal Decree is at present in the course of preparation and is the subject of consultation between the departments concerned. 4 Since the directive has not been transposed within the period prescribed by Article 15, it must be held that the defendant has failed to fulfil its obligations, as alleged by the Commission. 5 Given that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil the specific obligations incumbent on it under the directive, there is no need to examine whether it has thereby also failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the Treaty (see the judgments in Cases C-374/89 Commission v Belgium [1991] ECR I-367 and C-378/92 Commission v Spain [1993] ECR I-5095 ). 6 It must be held, therefore, that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community, apart from Article 11(2), and/or by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the said directive. Costs 7 Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs. Since the Kingdom of Belgium has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) hereby: 1. Declares that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 90/167/EEC of 26 March 1990 laying down the conditions governing the preparation, placing on the market and use of medicated feedingstuffs in the Community, apart from Article 11(2), and/or by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15 of the said directive; 2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII