Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. (Member States) [1991] EUECJ C-167/90 (16 May 1991)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Court of Justice of the European Communities (including Court of First Instance Decisions) >> Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. (Member States) [1991] EUECJ C-167/90 (16 May 1991) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1991/C16790.html Cite as: [1991] EUECJ C-167/90, [1991] ECR I-2535 [ New search ] [ Help ] IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The source of this judgment is the web site of the Court of Justice of the European Communities . The information in this database has been provided free of charge and is subject to a Court of Justice of the European Communities disclaimer and a copyright notice . This electronic version is not authentic and is subject to amendment. 61990J0167 Judgment of the Court of 16 May 1991. Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. Failure to implement a directive - Mutual recognition of diplomas and coordination in the field of pharmacy. Case C-167/90. European Court reports 1991 Page I-02535 Pub. RJ Page Pub somm ++++ 1. Member States - Obligations - Implementation of directives - Failure to implement - Justification - None (EEC Treaty, Art. 169) 2. Measures adopted by the Community institutions - Directives - Implementation by the Member States - Inadequacy of mere administrative practices (EEC Treaty, third paragraph of Art. 189) 1. According to well-established case-law, a Member State cannot plead provisions, practices or situations existing within its internal legal system in order to justify its failure to comply with obligations and time-limits laid down by Community directives. 2. Mere administrative practices, which by their nature may be altered at the whim of the authorities and lack the appropriate publicity, cannot be regarded as a valid fulfilment of the obligation imposed by Article 189 of the Treaty on Member States to which the directives are addressed (see judgment in Case 145/82 Commission v Italy [1983] ECR 711). In Case C-167/90, Commission of the European Communities, represented by Étienne Lasnet, Legal Adviser, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Guido Berardis, a member of the Commission' s Legal Department, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg, applicant, v Kingdom of Belgium, represented by Jan Devadder, Deputy Adviser to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Belgian Embassy, 4 Rue des Girondins, defendant, APPLICATION for a declaration that, by reserving the exercise of the activities of qualified pharmacists and of all pharmacists attached to hospital pharmacies or medical depositories to persons holding a diploma in hospital pharmacy, contrary to Article 1 of Council Directive 85/432/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy (Official Journal L 253, p. 34), and by failing to notify or to adopt before 1 October 1987, with the exception of the measures provided for in Articles 15 and 17, the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy (Official Journal L 253, p. 37), amended by Council Directive 85/584/EEC of 20 December 1985 (Official Journal L 372, p. 42) on account of the accession of Spain and Portugal, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty, THE COURT, composed of: O. Due, President, G. F. Mancini, T. F. O' Higgins and G. C. Rodríguez Iglesias (Presidents of Chambers), Sir Gordon Slynn, R. Joliet, F. A. Schockweiler, F. Grévisse and M. Zuleeg, Judges, (The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced.) hereby: 1. (a) Declares that, by reserving the exercise of the activities of qualified pharmacists and of pharmacists attached to hospital pharmacies or medical depositories to persons holding a diploma in hospital pharmacy awarded by a university recognized by the State, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1 of Council Directive 85/432/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy and under the EEC Treaty; (b) Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to implement Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 and Council Directive 85/584/EEC of 20 December 1985 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EEC Treaty; 2. Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. © European Communities, 2001 All rights reserved BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/1991/C16790.html