Commission v United Kingdom (Law relating to undertakings) [2004] EUECJ C-164/04 (18 November 2004)
The United Kingdom failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/17/EC by not adopting the required measures within the prescribed period.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] EUECJ C-164/04
- Parties
- Applicant: Commission of the European Communities; Respondent: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld; United Kingdom found in breach of obligations under Directive 2001/17/EC.
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Implement EU Directive, Member State Obligations, Insurance Sector Regulation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commission of the European Communities
Applicant
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the United Kingdom failed to adopt necessary measures to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC
- 2 Whether the United Kingdom failed to notify the Commission of such measures
Ratio Decidendi
The United Kingdom failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/17/EC by not adopting the required measures within the prescribed period.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; United Kingdom found in breach of obligations under Directive 2001/17/EC.
Orders
- The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2001/17/EC.
- The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment In its application, the Commission of the European Communities seeks a declaration of the Court of Justice that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings (OJ 2001 L 110, p. 28), or, in any event, by not notifying the Commission of such measures, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. In accordance with Article 31(1) of Directive 2001/17, Member States were obliged to bring into force the necessary laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with that directive before 20 April 2003 and inform the Commission thereof forthwith. In accordance with the procedure laid down by the first paragraph of Article 226 EC, having given the United Kingdom the opportunity to submit its observations, the Commission delivered a reasoned opinion on 15 October 2003, calling upon that Member State to take the necessary measures to comply with that opinion within two months from the date of its notification. Having not subsequently received any information to indicate that all the necessary measures had been adopted, the Commission decided to bring the present action. The United Kingdom Government acknowledges that it has not adopted the necessary measures within the prescribed period in order to comply with Directive 2001/17 in relation to the Lloyd-�s market and Gibraltar. In accordance with settled case-law, the question whether a Member State has failed to fulfil its obligations must be determined by reference to the situation prevailing in the Member State at the end of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (see, in particular, Case C-143/02 Commission v Italy [2003] ECR I-2877, paragraph 11; Case C-446/01 Commission v Spain [2003] ECR I-6053, paragraph 15). In this case, there is no dispute that, at the end of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion, the United Kingdom had not adopted all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17. Accordingly, the Commission-�s action must be upheld. The Court therefore finds that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. Costs Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party-�s pleadings. Since the Commission has applied for a costs order against the United Kingdom and the latter has been unsuccessful, the United Kingdom must be ordered to pay the costs. On those grounds, the Court (Fourth Chamber) hereby rules: 1. By not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. 2. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ordered to pay the costs. Signatures. - Language of the case: English. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII