Administration des impots v Guy Soler. [1983] EUECJ R-80/82 (5 May 1983)
A wine with a lees percentage much smaller than the average at first racking is considered separated from its lees under the relevant EU regulation; the national court must assess the percentage by reference to traditional production methods.
- Citation
- [1983] EUECJ R-80/82
- Parties
- Civil Party: Administration des impôts; Accused: Guy Soler
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling / Reference From National Court (cour De Cassation, France)
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; question answered for national court.
- Legal Topics
- Common Organization of the Market in Wine, Definition of 'new Wine Still in Fermentation', Interpretation of EU Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Administration des impôts
Civil Party
Guy Soler
Accused
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Reference From National Court (cour De Cassation, France)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a wine containing a negligible percentage of lees may be regarded as separated from its lees within the meaning of EU wine market regulations
Ratio Decidendi
A wine with a lees percentage much smaller than the average at first racking is considered separated from its lees under the relevant EU regulation; the national court must assess the percentage by reference to traditional production methods.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; question answered for national court.
Orders
- A wine containing a percentage of lees much smaller than the average percentage of lees obtained when the wine is first racked may be regarded as separated from its lees within the meaning of the relevant EU regulation. It is for the national court to assess the percentage by reference to traditional production...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment