Communicaid Group Ltd, v European Commission [2013] EUECJ T-4/13 (11 March 2013)

Communicaid Group Ltd, v European Commission [2013] EUECJ T-4/13 (11 March 2013)

The applicant failed to establish urgency or serious and irreparable harm as required for interim measures. The alleged pecuniary and reputational damages are not irreparable and can be compensated by damages. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of financial jeopardy or a flagrant illegality in the tender process. Loss of opportunity and competitive disadvantage are inherent risks in public procurement and do not justify interim relief.

Citation
[2013] EUECJ T-4/13
Parties
Applicant: Communicaid Group Ltd; Defendant: European Commission
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
11 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Measures / Order on Application for Interim Measures
Outcome
Application for interim measures dismissed
Legal Topics
Interim Measures, Suspension of Operation, Public Services Contracts, Tendering Procedure, Loss of Opportunity, Irreparable Harm, Urgency, Transparency, Non Discrimination, Equal Treatment
European Union Law Public Procurement Interim Measures Suspension of Operation Public Services Contracts Tendering Procedure Loss of Opportunity Irreparable Harm +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 34 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Communicaid Group Ltd

Applicant

European Commission

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Interim Measures / Order on Application for Interim Measures

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim measures suspending the operation of the Commission's decisions rejecting its tenders for language training contracts
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated serious and irreparable harm and urgency justifying interim relief

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish urgency or serious and irreparable harm as required for interim measures. The alleged pecuniary and reputational damages are not irreparable and can be compensated by damages. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence of financial jeopardy or a flagrant illegality in the tender process. Loss of opportunity and competitive disadvantage are inherent risks in public procurement and do not justify interim relief.

Court Disposition

Application for interim measures dismissed

Orders

  • The application for interim measures is dismissed.
  • The costs are reserved.