CTL Logistics (Rail transport - Infrastructure charges - Pricing : Judgment) [2017] EUECJ C-489/15 (09 November 2017)

CTL Logistics (Rail transport - Infrastructure charges - Pricing : Judgment) [2017] EUECJ C-489/15 (09 November 2017)

Directive 2001/14 precludes national legislation allowing civil courts to review and amend railway infrastructure charges for fairness on a case-by-case basis independently of the regulatory body. Such review undermines the principle of non-discrimination, the centralised oversight of charges, and the management independence required by EU law. Claims for repayment of charges must be made through the regulatory body, whose decisions are subject to judicial review, not direct civil court intervention.

Citation
[2017] EUECJ C-489/15
Parties
Applicant: CTL Logistics GmbH; Respondent: DB Netz AG
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
09 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling / Referral From Landgericht Berlin to Court of Justice of the European Union
Outcome
Application of national civil law provisions for individual fairness review of railway infrastructure charges is precluded by Directive 2001/14.
Legal Topics
Railway Infrastructure Charges, Non Discrimination, Regulatory Oversight, Judicial Review, Contractual Fairness
European Union Law Transport Law Administrative Law Contract Law Railway Infrastructure Charges Non Discrimination Regulatory Oversight Judicial Review +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CTL Logistics GmbH

Applicant

DB Netz AG

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Ruling / Referral From Landgericht Berlin to Court of Justice of the European Union

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether EU Directive 2001/14 precludes national civil courts from reviewing railway infrastructure charges for fairness under national civil law provisions
  2. 2 Whether claims for repayment of railway infrastructure charges must be made through the regulatory body
  3. 3 Compatibility of civil court review with EU law principles of non-discrimination and regulatory oversight

Ratio Decidendi

Directive 2001/14 precludes national legislation allowing civil courts to review and amend railway infrastructure charges for fairness on a case-by-case basis independently of the regulatory body. Such review undermines the principle of non-discrimination, the centralised oversight of charges, and the management independence required by EU law. Claims for repayment of charges must be made through the regulatory body, whose decisions are subject to judicial review, not direct civil court intervention.

Court Disposition

Application of national civil law provisions for individual fairness review of railway infrastructure charges is precluded by Directive 2001/14.

Orders

  • Claims for repayment of railway infrastructure charges must be made through the regulatory body.
  • Civil courts cannot independently review or amend charges for fairness outside the regulatory framework.