D.S. v. UKRAINE - 24107/13 (Judgment : Prohibition of torture (Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)) [2017] ECHR 992 (09 November 2017)
The applicant's conditions of detention were inadequate and no effective remedy was available, disclosing a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] ECHR 992
- Parties
- Applicant: D. S.; Respondent: Ukraine
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Application admissible; violation of Articles 3 and 13 found; just satisfaction awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Inadequate Conditions of Detention, Right to an Effective Remedy, Prohibition of Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. S.
Applicant
Ukraine
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights / Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's conditions of detention violated Article 3 of the Convention
- 2 Whether there was an effective remedy available to the applicant as required by Article 13
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's conditions of detention were inadequate and no effective remedy was available, disclosing a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
Application admissible; violation of Articles 3 and 13 found; just satisfaction awarded.
Orders
- The respondent State is to pay the applicant, within three months, the amount indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement.
- From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement, simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment