DICKMANN v. ROMANIA - 36017/97 [2003] ECHR 380 (22 July 2003)
The Court found that the failure of the Romanian authorities to enforce the final domestic judgment in favor of the applicant constituted a violation of Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2003] ECHR 380
- Parties
- Applicant: Dickmann; Respondent: Romania
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the applicant
- Legal Topics
- Right to Property, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Dickmann
Applicant
Romania
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's right to property under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 was violated
- 2 Whether there was a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the failure of the Romanian authorities to enforce the final domestic judgment in favor of the applicant constituted a violation of Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
judgment for the applicant
Orders
- Romania to pay just satisfaction to the applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment