Carra & Ors (Competition) [2000] EUECJ C-258/98 (08 June 2000)
Articles 86 and 90 EC Treaty have direct effect; national courts must protect individual rights conferred by these provisions and refuse to apply conflicting national laws prohibiting private employment intermediaries when public placement offices cannot satisfy market demand and statutory prohibitions render private placement impossible.
- Citation
- [2000] EUECJ C-258/98
- Parties
- Accused: Mr Carra; Accused: Mrs Colombo; Accused: Mrs Gianassi; Referring Court: Pretore di Firenze
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceedings / Preliminary Reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities
- Outcome
- First question answered; second question declared inadmissible.
- Legal Topics
- Direct Effect of EC Treaty Provisions, Abuse of Dominant Position, Public Placement Offices, Private Employment Intermediaries, Conflict Between National and EU Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Carra
Accused
Mrs Colombo
Accused
Mrs Gianassi
Accused
Pretore di Firenze
Referring Court
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings / Preliminary Reference to the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Articles 86 and 90 EC Treaty have direct effect and require national courts to disregard conflicting national law
- 2 Whether a Member State's prohibition of private employment intermediaries breaches EC Treaty provisions
- 3 Whether legislative amendments constitute abuse of dominant position
Ratio Decidendi
Articles 86 and 90 EC Treaty have direct effect; national courts must protect individual rights conferred by these provisions and refuse to apply conflicting national laws prohibiting private employment intermediaries when public placement offices cannot satisfy market demand and statutory prohibitions render private placement impossible.
Court Disposition
First question answered; second question declared inadmissible.
Orders
- National courts must give full effect to EC Treaty provisions and refuse to apply conflicting national laws prohibiting private employment intermediaries under specified circumstances.
- Decision on costs is a matter for the national court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment