Dusan TOMKO v Slovakia - 45108/08 [2011] ECHR 1565 (20 September 2011)
The Court found the friendly settlement satisfactory and based on respect for human rights, with no reason to continue examination, and struck the case out of its list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] ECHR 1565
- Parties
- Applicant: Dušan Tomko; Respondent: Government of the Slovak Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to European Court of Human Rights / Friendly Settlement and Decision to Strike Out
- Outcome
- struck out
- Legal Topics
- Length of Proceedings, Right to Fair Trial, Right to Effective Remedy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dušan Tomko
Applicant
Government of the Slovak Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to European Court of Human Rights / Friendly Settlement and Decision to Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 length of proceedings concerning claim for payment
- 2 violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement satisfactory and based on respect for human rights, with no reason to continue examination, and struck the case out of its list.
Court Disposition
struck out
Orders
- Application struck out of the list of cases.
- Government to pay applicant 5,300 euros within three months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Dusan TOMKO v Slovakia - 45108/08 [2011] ECHR 1565 (20 September 2011) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1565.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1565 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 45108/08 by Dušan TOMKO against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 20 September 2011 as a Committee composed of: Ineta Ziemele, President, Ján Šikuta, Kristina Pardalos, judges, and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 September 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Du š an Tomko, is a Slovak national who was born in 1952 and lives in Ko šice . He was represented before the Court by Mr R. Kovalčík, a lawyer practising in Ko š ice. The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government ” ) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Piro šíková. The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the length of proceedings which concerned his claim for payment of a sum of money. On 28 June 2011 and 20 July 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Slovakia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 5,300 euros. This sum will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Marialena Tsirli Ineta Ziemele Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1565.html