Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles (Intellectual, industrial and commercial property - Designs Intellectual : Judgment) [2017] EUECJ C-361/15 (21 September 2017)
The General Court erred in law by requiring EUIPO to reconstruct earlier designs from separate catalogue elements, but this error did not affect the validity of the judgment annulling the Board of Appeal's decision, as the operative part was well founded on other grounds. The novelty and individual character of a Community design must be assessed in relation to any earlier design made available to the public, regardless of the product sector. The scope of protection is not limited to the product indicated in the registration. The General Court did not exceed its powers of judicial review.
- Citation
- [2017] EUECJ C-361/15
- Parties
- Appellant: Easy Sanitary Solutions BV (ESS); Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); Respondent: Group Nivelles NV; Predecessor to Respondent: I-Drain BVBA; Intervener: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Joined Appeals (c 361/15 P and C 405/15 P) From General Court Judgment / Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; judgment of the General Court upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Community Design, Novelty, Individual Character, Burden of Proof, Scope of Protection, Disclosure to the Public, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Easy Sanitary Solutions BV (ESS)
Appellant
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Appellant
Group Nivelles NV
Respondent
I-Drain BVBA
Predecessor to Respondent
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Joined Appeals (c 361/15 P and C 405/15 P) From General Court Judgment / Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the General Court erred in law regarding the burden of proof and evidence in invalidity proceedings for Community designs under Regulation No 6/2002.
- 2 Whether the novelty and individual character of a Community design must be assessed in relation to the product in which the design is incorporated or applied.
- 3 Whether the General Court exceeded its powers of judicial review under Article 61 of Regulation No 6/2002.
Ratio Decidendi
The General Court erred in law by requiring EUIPO to reconstruct earlier designs from separate catalogue elements, but this error did not affect the validity of the judgment annulling the Board of Appeal's decision, as the operative part was well founded on other grounds. The novelty and individual character of a Community design must be assessed in relation to any earlier design made available to the public, regardless of the product sector. The scope of protection is not limited to the product indicated in the registration. The General Court did not exceed its powers of judicial review.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; judgment of the General Court upheld.
Orders
- The appeals of ESS and EUIPO are dismissed.
- The judgment of the General Court annulling the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment