Egmez v. Cyprus (dec.) - 12214/07 - CLIN [2012] ECHR 2037 (18 September 2012)

Egmez v. Cyprus (dec.) - 12214/07 - CLIN [2012] ECHR 2037 (18 September 2012)

The Court found that the steps taken by the Government formed part of the measures adopted in pursuance of the initial judgment and did not constitute new factual developments. Therefore, the Court had no jurisdiction to examine the applicant’s complaint.

Citation
[2012] ECHR 2037
Parties
Applicant: Egmez; Respondent: Cyprus
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
18 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
inadmissible
Legal Topics
Implementation of Previous Judgment, Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae, Article 3, Article 13
Human Rights Law Implementation of Previous Judgment Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae Article 3 Article 13

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Egmez

Applicant

Cyprus

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Decision on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Court have jurisdiction to review measures taken by the respondent State to execute a previous judgment when no new facts are raised?
  2. 2 Is the complaint regarding the adequacy of the investigation a new issue under Article 3?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the steps taken by the Government formed part of the measures adopted in pursuance of the initial judgment and did not constitute new factual developments. Therefore, the Court had no jurisdiction to examine the applicant’s complaint.

Court Disposition

inadmissible