ERGIN AND KESKIN v. TURKEY (NO. 1) - 50273/99 [2005] ECHR 395 (16 June 2005)
The Court found that the applicants' conviction constituted a disproportionate interference with their right to freedom of expression and that the military court did not provide sufficient guarantees of independence and impartiality, resulting in a violation of Articles 10 and 6 of the Convention.
- Citation
- [2005] ECHR 395
- Parties
- Applicant: Ergin; Applicant: Keskin; Respondent: Turkey
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the applicants
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Expression, Military Justice, Right to a Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ergin
Applicant
Keskin
Applicant
Turkey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants' conviction for expressing opinions constituted a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- 2 Whether the proceedings before the military court were compatible with Article 6 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicants' conviction constituted a disproportionate interference with their right to freedom of expression and that the military court did not provide sufficient guarantees of independence and impartiality, resulting in a violation of Articles 10 and 6 of the Convention.
Court Disposition
judgment for the applicants
Orders
- The Court found violations of Articles 10 and 6 of the Convention.
- The respondent State is to pay just satisfaction to the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment