Commission v RQ (Staff Regulations of officials and Conditions of Employment of other servants - Commission Decision waiving official's immunity - Opinion) [2019] EUECJ C-831/18P_O (19 December 2019)
A Commission decision waiving an official's immunity constitutes an act adversely affecting that official under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations because it removes a direct legal protection and exposes the official to national proceedings. The right to be heard under Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter applies before such a decision is taken, and the Commission must balance investigative confidentiality with the official's procedural rights through a proportionality assessment. The Commission's systematic omission of a hearing violates the Charter and the Staff Regulations.
- Citation
- [2019] EUECJ C-831/18P_O
- Parties
- Appellant: European Commission; Respondent: RQ
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Opinion of Advocate General on Appeal From General Court
- Outcome
- Opinion to dismiss the Commission's appeal and uphold the General Court's annulment of the Commission's decision waiving RQ's immunity.
- Legal Topics
- Staff Regulations of EU Officials, Privileges and Immunities, Right to Be Heard, Good Administration, Waiver of Immunity, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
European Commission
Appellant
RQ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Opinion of Advocate General on Appeal From General Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Commission decision waiving an official's immunity constitutes an act adversely affecting the official under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations
- 2 Whether the right to be heard under Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter applies before waiving immunity
- 3 Whether the Commission must balance investigative confidentiality with the official's procedural rights
Ratio Decidendi
A Commission decision waiving an official's immunity constitutes an act adversely affecting that official under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations because it removes a direct legal protection and exposes the official to national proceedings. The right to be heard under Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter applies before such a decision is taken, and the Commission must balance investigative confidentiality with the official's procedural rights through a proportionality assessment. The Commission's systematic omission of a hearing violates the Charter and the Staff Regulations.
Court Disposition
Opinion to dismiss the Commission's appeal and uphold the General Court's annulment of the Commission's decision waiving RQ's immunity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment