Epson Europe (Approximation of laws) [2000] EUECJ C-375/98 (08 June 2000)
Article 5(4) of Directive 90/435/EEC, which sets limits on withholding tax rates for profits distributed by Portuguese subsidiaries to parent companies in other Member States, applies not only to corporation tax (IRC) but also to any other taxation, regardless of its designation, that takes the form of a withholding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EUECJ C-375/98
- Parties
- Appellant: Fazenda Pública; Respondent: Epson Europe BV
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (ecj) / Reference From National Supreme Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; Article 5(4) applies to all withholding taxes on dividends, not just IRC.
- Legal Topics
- Parent Subsidiary Directive, Withholding Tax, Double Taxation, Interpretation of EU Directives
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fazenda Pública
Appellant
Epson Europe BV
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (ecj) / Reference From National Supreme Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 5(4) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC limits apply only to corporation tax (IRC) or also to other withholding taxes such as ISD levied on dividends distributed by Portuguese subsidiaries to parent companies in other Member States
Ratio Decidendi
Article 5(4) of Directive 90/435/EEC, which sets limits on withholding tax rates for profits distributed by Portuguese subsidiaries to parent companies in other Member States, applies not only to corporation tax (IRC) but also to any other taxation, regardless of its designation, that takes the form of a withholding tax on dividends.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; Article 5(4) applies to all withholding taxes on dividends, not just IRC.
Orders
- Article 5(4) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the derogation relates not only to corporation tax but also to any taxation, of whatever nature or however described, which takes the form of a withholding tax on dividends distributed by such subsidiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment