IULIAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 29349/16 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2021] ECHR 1118 (16 December 2021)

IULIAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - 29349/16 (Judgment : Article 3 - Prohibition of torture : Fourth Section Committee) [2021] ECHR 1118 (16 December 2021)

The Court found that the applicants' detention conditions were inadequate and breached Article 3 of the Convention, based on established case-law and the facts presented.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] ECHR 1118
Parties
Applicant: Florin Iulian; Applicant: Mihai-Alexandru Cojocaru; Applicant: Alexandru Cioroianu; Applicant: Lucian Găină; Applicant: Ionuț-Alexandru Constantin; Applicant: Constantin Bucioveanu; Applicant: Aleksandar Tsonev; Applicant: Cătălin-Iulian Șerban; Applicant: Ovidiu Nagy; Applicant: Lucian-Cristian Doboș; Applicant: Gheorghe Aurelian Marian; Applicant: Tiberiu Feier; Applicant: Dan-Ioan Cilean; Applicant: Vlad-Andrei Vlongo; Applicant: Nelu Cercel; Applicant: Ionuț-Alexandru Lazăr; Applicant: Octavian Motoi; Applicant: Elena Fota; Applicant: Rareș Chebeleu; Applicant: Ioan Bîrsan; Respondent: Romanian Government
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
European Court of Human Rights Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Applications joined; complaints regarding detention conditions admissible and breach of Article 3 found; remainder of application no. 9465/17 inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Prison Conditions, Article 3 ECHR, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Just Satisfaction
Human Rights Law International Law Prison Conditions Article 3 ECHR Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Just Satisfaction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 20
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Florin Iulian

Applicant

Mihai-Alexandru Cojocaru

Applicant

Alexandru Cioroianu

Applicant

Lucian Găină

Applicant

Ionuț-Alexandru Constantin

Applicant

Constantin Bucioveanu

Applicant

Aleksandar Tsonev

Applicant

Cătălin-Iulian Șerban

Applicant

Ovidiu Nagy

Applicant

Lucian-Cristian Doboș

Applicant

Gheorghe Aurelian Marian

Applicant

Tiberiu Feier

Applicant

Dan-Ioan Cilean

Applicant

Vlad-Andrei Vlongo

Applicant

Nelu Cercel

Applicant

Ionuț-Alexandru Lazăr

Applicant

Octavian Motoi

Applicant

Elena Fota

Applicant

Rareș Chebeleu

Applicant

Ioan Bîrsan

Applicant

Romanian Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

European Court of Human Rights Application / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conditions of detention violated Article 3 of the Convention
  2. 2 Admissibility of complaints under Article 3
  3. 3 Just satisfaction under Article 41

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicants' detention conditions were inadequate and breached Article 3 of the Convention, based on established case-law and the facts presented.

Court Disposition

Applications joined; complaints regarding detention conditions admissible and breach of Article 3 found; remainder of application no. 9465/17 inadmissible.

Orders

  • Respondent State to pay applicants the amounts indicated in the appended table within three months, converted to local currency at settlement date rate.
  • Simple interest payable on awarded amounts after three months at ECB marginal lending rate plus three percentage points.