FRATTINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY (REVISION) - 52924/99 [2002] ECHR 770 (26 November 2002)

The Court found that the conditions for revision were not met as the alleged new facts were either not new or not decisive for the outcome of the case.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2002] ECHR 770
Parties: Applicant: Frattini and Others; Respondent: Italy
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 26 November 2002
Procedural Posture: Revision Application / European Court of Human Rights Judgment
Outcome: application for revision dismissed
Legal Topics: Revision of Judgment, Article 41 ECHR, Just Satisfaction

Human Rights Law Revision of Judgment Article 41 ECHR Just Satisfaction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Frattini and Others

Applicant

Italy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Revision Application / European Court of Human Rights Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the conditions for revision of a previous judgment are met under the Rules of Court
2 Whether new facts justify reopening the case

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the conditions for revision were not met as the alleged new facts were either not new or not decisive for the outcome of the case.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.