Criminal proceedings against Robert Heinrich Maria Mutsch. [1985] EUECJ R-137/84 (11 July 1985)
The right to require criminal proceedings in a language other than the normal court language, if granted to national workers, must also be granted to workers from other Member States under the principle of free movement of workers and non-discrimination. This right constitutes a 'social advantage' within the meaning of Regulation 1612/68.
- Citation
- [1985] EUECJ R-137/84
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Ministère Public (Public Prosecutor's Office); Accused: Robert Heinrich Maria Mutsch
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Judgment on Reference From Cour D'appel De Liège
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling: A worker who is a national of one Member State and habitually resides in another Member State is entitled to require that criminal proceedings against him take place in a language other than the language normally used in proceedings before the court which tries him, if workers who are nationals...
- Legal Topics
- Free Movement of Workers, Equal Treatment, Use of Languages in Criminal Proceedings, Social Advantages, Non Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ministère Public (Public Prosecutor's Office)
Prosecutor
Robert Heinrich Maria Mutsch
Accused
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Judgment on Reference From Cour D'appel De Liège
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a national law allowing only Belgian nationals to require criminal proceedings in German in certain municipalities is compatible with EU law, specifically the principles of non-discrimination and free movement of workers.
Ratio Decidendi
The right to require criminal proceedings in a language other than the normal court language, if granted to national workers, must also be granted to workers from other Member States under the principle of free movement of workers and non-discrimination. This right constitutes a 'social advantage' within the meaning of Regulation 1612/68.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling: A worker who is a national of one Member State and habitually resides in another Member State is entitled to require that criminal proceedings against him take place in a language other than the language normally used in proceedings before the court which tries him, if workers who are nationals...
Orders
- The principle of free movement of workers requires equal language rights in criminal proceedings for migrant workers as for national workers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment