Fulvio Fonzi v Commission of the EAEC. [1964] EUECJ C-30/64R (7 August 1964)

Fulvio Fonzi v Commission of the EAEC. [1964] EUECJ C-30/64R (7 August 1964)

The application for suspension was inadmissible because the applicant had already complied with the decision, making the application out of time and lacking in subject matter.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1964] EUECJ C-30/64R
Parties
Applicant: Fulvio Fonzi; Defendant: Commission of the European Atomic Energy Community
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Relief / Order on Admissibility of Application for Suspension
Outcome
application inadmissible
Legal Topics
Interim Measures, Admissibility, Execution of Decision
European Union Law Administrative Law Interim Measures Admissibility Execution of Decision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fulvio Fonzi

Applicant

Commission of the European Atomic Energy Community

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Interim Relief / Order on Admissibility of Application for Suspension

  1. 1 Whether the application for suspension of the Commission's decision is admissible after the applicant has already complied with the decision

Ratio Decidendi

The application for suspension was inadmissible because the applicant had already complied with the decision, making the application out of time and lacking in subject matter.

Court Disposition

application inadmissible

Orders

  • The application is inadmissible.
  • The costs are reserved.