Genil 48 SL, v Bankinter SA, [2013] EUECJ C-604/11 (30 May 2013)
Article 4(1)(4) of Directive 2004/39/EC covers the offering of a swap agreement as investment advice only if the recommendation is personal, suitable, and not public. Article 19(9) exempts assessment obligations only if the investment service is an integral part of a financial product subject to equivalent risk assessment or information requirements. The Directive does not itself render contracts void for non-compliance; contractual consequences are for national law, subject to EU principles.
- Citation
- [2013] EUECJ C-604/11
- Parties
- Applicant: Genil 48 SL; Applicant: Comercial Hostelera de Grandes Vinos SL (CHGV); Respondent: Bankinter SA; Respondent: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (cjeu) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Questions answered; interpretation provided; no annulment or direct order issued.
- Legal Topics
- Directive 2004/39/ec (mi Fid), Investment Advice, Suitability and Appropriateness Tests, Swap Agreements, Investor Protection, Contractual Consequences of Non Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Genil 48 SL
Applicant
Comercial Hostelera de Grandes Vinos SL (CHGV)
Applicant
Bankinter SA
Respondent
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (cjeu) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether offering a swap agreement to cover interest rate risk constitutes 'investment advice' under Article 4(1)(4) of Directive 2004/39/EC
- 2 Whether omission of suitability/appropriateness tests under Article 19(4) and (5) of Directive 2004/39/EC renders contracts void ab initio
- 3 Scope of Article 19(9) of Directive 2004/39/EC regarding exemptions from assessment obligations
Ratio Decidendi
Article 4(1)(4) of Directive 2004/39/EC covers the offering of a swap agreement as investment advice only if the recommendation is personal, suitable, and not public. Article 19(9) exempts assessment obligations only if the investment service is an integral part of a financial product subject to equivalent risk assessment or information requirements. The Directive does not itself render contracts void for non-compliance; contractual consequences are for national law, subject to EU principles.
Court Disposition
Questions answered; interpretation provided; no annulment or direct order issued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment