Gerlach (Customs union) [2007] EUECJ C-44/06 (08 March 2007)
The Member State to which the office of departure belongs cannot grant the three-month period for furnishing proof after the decision to recover import duties; the period must be granted before such a decision, in accordance with Article 11a(2) of Regulation No 1062/87 and fundamental procedural rights.
- Citation
- [2007] EUECJ C-44/06
- Parties
- Applicant: Gerlach & Co. mbH; Respondent: Hauptzollamt Frankfurt (Oder)
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Request for Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
- Outcome
- preliminary ruling issued
- Legal Topics
- Community Transit Procedure, Recovery of Import Duties, Procedural Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerlach & Co. mbH
Applicant
Hauptzollamt Frankfurt (Oder)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Request for Preliminary Ruling / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of Article 11a(2) of Regulation No 1062/87 regarding the timing of granting the three-month period for proof before recovery of import duties
Ratio Decidendi
The Member State to which the office of departure belongs cannot grant the three-month period for furnishing proof after the decision to recover import duties; the period must be granted before such a decision, in accordance with Article 11a(2) of Regulation No 1062/87 and fundamental procedural rights.
Court Disposition
preliminary ruling issued
Orders
- Article 11a(2) of Regulation No 1062/87 must be interpreted as meaning that the Member State to which the office of departure belongs cannot grant to the principal the three-month period to furnish proof after the decision to recover import duties, during complaint proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment