Gesellschaft fuer Getreidehandel mbH v Commission of the European Communities. [1973] EUECJ C-24/66 (13 December 1973)

Gesellschaft fuer Getreidehandel mbH v Commission of the European Communities. [1973] EUECJ C-24/66 (13 December 1973)

The application for interpretation was inadmissible because the applicant was not a party to the original judgment and the request concerned proceedings between different parties, which is not permitted under Article 40 of the Statute.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1973] EUECJ C-24/66
Parties
Applicant: Gesellschaft für Getreidehandel mbH; Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Application for Interpretation of Judgment / Judgment on Admissibility
Outcome
Application rejected as inadmissible; applicant ordered to pay costs.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Judgments, Admissibility, Binding Effect of Judgments
European Union Law Civil Procedure Interpretation of Judgments Admissibility Binding Effect of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gesellschaft für Getreidehandel mbH

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Interpretation of Judgment / Judgment on Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether a party not involved in the original judgment may request its interpretation under Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the EEC
  2. 2 Whether the binding effect of a judgment in an action for noncontractual liability extends to parallel actions before national courts

Ratio Decidendi

The application for interpretation was inadmissible because the applicant was not a party to the original judgment and the request concerned proceedings between different parties, which is not permitted under Article 40 of the Statute.

Court Disposition

Application rejected as inadmissible; applicant ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • Application for interpretation rejected as inadmissible
  • Applicant ordered to pay the costs