Giovanni Ballone Burini v Court of Justice of the European Communities. (Officials) [1996] EUECJ T-138/96 (19 September 1996)

The President of the Court of First Instance considered the requirements for granting interim relief and determined whether the suspension of the contested measure was warranted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1996] EUECJ T-138/96
Parties: Applicant: Giovanni Ballone Burini; Respondent: Court of Justice of the European Communities
Jurisdiction: European Union
Procedural Posture: Application for Interim Relief / Order on Application for Suspension of Operation of a Measure
Outcome: application for interim relief disposed by order
Legal Topics: Officials, Competitions, Non Admission to Competition, Interim Relief, Suspension of Measure

Administrative Law Employment Law Officials Competitions Non Admission to Competition Interim Relief Suspension of Measure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Giovanni Ballone Burini

Applicant

Court of Justice of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Interim Relief / Order on Application for Suspension of Operation of a Measure

Legal Issues

1 whether the applicant is entitled to suspension of the operation of a measure relating to non-admission to a competition

Ratio Decidendi

The President of the Court of First Instance considered the requirements for granting interim relief and determined whether the suspension of the contested measure was warranted.

Court Disposition

application for interim relief disposed by order

Orders

application for suspension of operation of the measure addressed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.