Giovanni Battista Abello & Ors and Gerhard Riesch v Commission of the European Communities. (Officials) [1995] EUECJ T-544/93 (7 December 1995)

The Court held that the Council Regulations in question were not vitiated by illegality and that the pay slips and weightings applied to the applicants were lawful.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1995] EUECJ T-544/93
Parties: Applicant: Giovanni Battista Abello and others; Applicant: Gerhard Riesch; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction: European Union
Procedural Posture: Staff Case / Judgment
Outcome: applications dismissed
Legal Topics: Officials' Remuneration, Pay Slips, Weightings, Objection of Illegality

European Union Law Employment Law Officials' Remuneration Pay Slips Weightings Objection of Illegality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Giovanni Battista Abello and others

Applicant

Gerhard Riesch

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Staff Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Legality of Council Regulations Nos 3761/92, 3765/92 and 3766/92 regarding officials' pay weightings
2 Validity of pay slips issued under these regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the Council Regulations in question were not vitiated by illegality and that the pay slips and weightings applied to the applicants were lawful.

Court Disposition

applications dismissed

Orders

Applicants' actions are dismissed
Applicants to bear their own costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.