Globula a.s v European Commission [2013] EUECJ T-465/11 (06 September 2013)
The procedural and substantive changes introduced by Article 36 of the Third Gas Directive form an indivisible whole and cannot be applied retroactively. The Second Gas Directive applies to the present case, and the Commission's contested decision must be annulled.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EUECJ T-465/11
- Parties
- Applicant: Globula a.s.; Respondent: European Commission; Intervener: Czech Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Annulment Action / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- contested decision annulled
- Legal Topics
- Directive Interpretation, Third Party Access, Gas Market Regulation, Procedural and Substantive Law, Retroactivity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Globula a.s.
Applicant
European Commission
Respondent
Czech Republic
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Annulment Action / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission applied the correct procedural and substantive law in its decision
- 2 Whether the Third Gas Directive could be applied retroactively to pending procedures
- 3 Whether the contested decision should be annulled
Ratio Decidendi
The procedural and substantive changes introduced by Article 36 of the Third Gas Directive form an indivisible whole and cannot be applied retroactively. The Second Gas Directive applies to the present case, and the Commission's contested decision must be annulled.
Court Disposition
contested decision annulled
Orders
- Annuls Decision C (2011) 4509 of the Commission of 27 June 2011
- Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Globula a.s.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment