Graham French & Ors v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities. (Manifest inadmissibility) [2004] EUECJ T-319/03 (20 February 2004)

Graham French & Ors v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities. (Manifest inadmissibility) [2004] EUECJ T-319/03 (20 February 2004)

The Court found the action manifestly inadmissible as it did not meet the admissibility requirements under EU law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] EUECJ T-319/03
Parties
Applicant: Graham French and Others; Respondent: Council of the European Union; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Action for Damages / Order on Manifest Inadmissibility
Outcome
Action dismissed as manifestly inadmissible
Legal Topics
Manifest Inadmissibility, Damages, Jurisdiction
European Union Law Civil Procedure Manifest Inadmissibility Damages Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham French and Others

Applicant

Council of the European Union

Respondent

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Action for Damages / Order on Manifest Inadmissibility

  1. 1 Whether the action for damages is admissible under EU law

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the action manifestly inadmissible as it did not meet the admissibility requirements under EU law.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed as manifestly inadmissible

Orders

  • The action for damages is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible