ANTOMS v. LATVIA - 58262/09 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1281 (03 July 2012)

Not applicable; this is a communicated case with questions to the parties, not a final judgment.

Citation: [2012] ECHR 1281
Parties: Applicant: Guntars Antoms; Respondent: Latvia
Jurisdiction: European Union
Judgment Date: 03 July 2012
Procedural Posture: Application to European Court of Human Rights / Communicated Case
Outcome: Communicated to the parties for observations; no final determination.
Legal Topics: Attorney Client Privilege, Right to Privacy, Effective Remedy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Guntars Antoms

Applicant

Latvia

Respondent

Application to European Court of Human Rights / Communicated Case

1 Whether the covert recording of attorney-client conversation violated Article 8 of the Convention
2 Whether the interference was in accordance with law and necessary under Article 8 § 2
3 Whether adequate and effective safeguards existed against abuse of Article 8 rights

Not applicable; this is a communicated case with questions to the parties, not a final judgment.

Communicated to the parties for observations; no final determination.