Gyorgy DIANOVSZKI v Hungary - 48103/07 [2011] ECHR 1918 (18 October 2011)
The Court found the friendly settlement acceptable and based on respect for human rights, and therefore struck the case out of its list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] ECHR 1918
- Parties
- Applicant: György Dianovszki; Respondent: Hungarian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- Application struck out of the list of cases
- Legal Topics
- Length of Civil Proceedings, Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
György Dianovszki
Applicant
Hungarian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement acceptable and based on respect for human rights, and therefore struck the case out of its list.
Court Disposition
Application struck out of the list of cases
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Gyorgy DIANOVSZKI v Hungary - 48103/07 [2011] ECHR 1918 (18 October 2011) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1918.html Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1918 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 48103/07 by György DIANOVSZKI against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 18 October 2011 as a Committee composed of: Dragoljub Popović, President, András Sajó, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 October 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr György Dianovszki, was a Hungarian national born in 1948 who lived in Pákozd. He died on 20 April 2010. Mr and Mrs Imre Ambrus are his heirs. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings to which he was a party. On 27 and 31 July 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant’s heirs agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them jointly EUR 2,400 (two thousand four hundred euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Hungarian forints at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. This amount will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reason to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Françoise Elens-Passos Dragoljub Popović Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1918.html