Criminal proceedings against Lahlou Hassan. (Preliminary rulings) [1996] EUECJ C-196/96 (19 July 1996)
The reference was inadmissible because the national court failed to provide sufficient factual and legislative context, preventing the Court from giving a useful interpretation of Community law.
- Citation
- [1996] EUECJ C-196/96
- Parties
- Defendant: Hassan Lahlou; Referring Court: Pretura Circondariale di Roma, Sezione Distaccata di Tivoli
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Order on Admissibility
- Outcome
- Request for a preliminary ruling declared inadmissible.
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Reference, Admissibility, Copyright Management, Free Movement of Goods, Freedom to Provide Services
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Lahlou
Defendant
Pretura Circondariale di Roma, Sezione Distaccata di Tivoli
Referring Court
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Ruling (reference) / Order on Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether national legislation granting a copyright management monopoly is compatible with EC Treaty provisions on free movement of goods and services
- 2 Whether recourse to criminal penalties for copyright management is compatible with Community law
- 3 Whether such national legislation constitutes arbitrary discrimination or disguised restriction of trade
Ratio Decidendi
The reference was inadmissible because the national court failed to provide sufficient factual and legislative context, preventing the Court from giving a useful interpretation of Community law.
Court Disposition
Request for a preliminary ruling declared inadmissible.
Orders
- The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Pretura Circondariale di Roma, Sezione Distaccata di Tivoli, by order of 15 May 1996 is inadmissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment