Helena ANTALOVA and Ondrej ANTAL v Slovakia - 9177/07 [2009] ECHR 2142 (1 December 2009)
The Court found the friendly settlement acceptable and based on respect for human rights, and saw no reason to continue examining the application.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ECHR 2142
- Parties
- Applicant: Helena Antalová; Applicant: Ondrej Antal; Respondent: Government of the Slovak Republic
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- Application struck out of the list of cases
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Proceedings, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helena Antalová
Applicant
Ondrej Antal
Applicant
Government of the Slovak Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement acceptable and based on respect for human rights, and saw no reason to continue examining the application.
Court Disposition
Application struck out of the list of cases
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Helena ANTALOVA and Ondrej ANTAL v Slovakia - 9177/07 [2009] ECHR 2142 (1 December 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/2142.html Cite as: [2009] ECHR 2142 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 9177/07 by Helena ANTALOV Á and Ondrej ANTAL against Slovakia The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1 December 2009 as a Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Giovanni Bonello, David Thór Björgvinsson, Ján Šikuta, Päivi Hirvelä, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 13 February 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The application was lodged by M rs Helena Antalová and her husband Mr Ondrej Antal. The applicants are Slovakian nationals who were born in 1946 and 1943 respectively and live in Rimavská Sobota. The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Pirošíková. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings in their civil action had lasted an unreasonably long time. On 7 and 23 October 2009 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Slovakia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them 5,300 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses. That sum will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Fatoş Aracı Nicolas Bratza Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/2142.html