ZOCK c. ALLEMAGNE - 3098/08 (Affaire Communiquée) [2012] ECHR 1072 (23 May 2012)

ZOCK c. ALLEMAGNE - 3098/08 (Affaire Communiquée) [2012] ECHR 1072 (23 May 2012)

The courts upheld the involuntary commitment and forced medication on the basis that the applicant was unable to consent due to her psychiatric illness, posed a danger to herself and others, and that the benefits of treatment outweighed the risks. The procedural deficiencies in medical reporting did not affect the substantive correctness of the decisions, as later evidence confirmed the necessity and proportionality of the measures.

Citation
[2012] ECHR 1072
Parties
Applicant: Helga Zock; Respondent: Germany
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
23 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Statement of Facts / Communicated Case
Outcome
Application communicated; no final judgment on merits at this stage.
Legal Topics
Involuntary Commitment, Forced Medical Treatment, Right to Liberty, Right to Self Determination, Living Will, Judicial Oversight of Medical Treatment
Human Rights Law Mental Health Law Medical Law Involuntary Commitment Forced Medical Treatment Right to Liberty Right to Self Determination Living Will +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Helga Zock

Applicant

Germany

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to the European Court of Human Rights / Statement of Facts / Communicated Case

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether forced medication with antipsychotic drugs contrary to a living will violates the right to liberty and self-determination under the Convention
  2. 2 Whether Article 1906 of the Civil Code was lawfully applied to permit involuntary commitment and forced medication
  3. 3 Whether the interference with the applicant's rights was in accordance with the law and necessary in a democratic society

Ratio Decidendi

The courts upheld the involuntary commitment and forced medication on the basis that the applicant was unable to consent due to her psychiatric illness, posed a danger to herself and others, and that the benefits of treatment outweighed the risks. The procedural deficiencies in medical reporting did not affect the substantive correctness of the decisions, as later evidence confirmed the necessity and proportionality of the measures.

Court Disposition

Application communicated; no final judgment on merits at this stage.