Ilija DODOS v Croatia - 29706/08 [2010] ECHR 1151 (24 June 2010)
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be based on respect for human rights and saw no public policy reasons to continue examining the application, thus striking the case out of the list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 1151
- Parties
- Applicant: Ilija Dodoš; Respondent: Republic of Croatia
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- Struck out
- Legal Topics
- Length of Proceedings, Article 6 § 1 ECHR, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ilija Dodoš
Applicant
Republic of Croatia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
- 2 Whether the friendly settlement respects human rights and public policy
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be based on respect for human rights and saw no public policy reasons to continue examining the application, thus striking the case out of the list.
Court Disposition
Struck out
Orders
- Application struck out of the list of cases
- Government to pay applicant 2,300 euros within three months, converted to Croatian kuna at the applicable rate, free of taxes
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Ilija DODOS v Croatia - 29706/08 [2010] ECHR 1151 (24 June 2010) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1151.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 1151 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 29706/08 by Ilija DODOŠ against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24 June 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Christos Rozakis, President, Nina Vajić, Anatoly Kovler, Elisabeth Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Giorgio Malinverni, George Nicolaou, judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 May 2008, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr Ilija Dodoš, a Croatian national who was born in 1927 and lives in Dvor. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. StaZnik. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the civil proceedings. On 27 April and 25 May 2010 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against the Republic of Croatia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 2,300 euros to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Croatian kuna at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1151.html