Import Gadgets Sarl v LAMP SpA. [1976] EUECJ R-22/76 (22 September 1976)
Laughing devices suitable principally for use in dolls that are representations of human beings come within heading 97.02 B of the Common Customs Tariff.
- Citation
- [1976] EUECJ R-22/76
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Import Gadgets Sàrl; Defendant: LAMP SpA
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Reference for a Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling by Court of Justice of the European Communities
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling issued; laughing devices suitable for use principally in dolls that are representations of human beings come within heading 97.02 B of the Common Customs Tariff.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Common Customs Tariff, Classification of Goods, Brussels Nomenclature, Tariff Headings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Import Gadgets Sàrl
Plaintiff
LAMP SpA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Reference for a Preliminary Ruling / Preliminary Ruling by Court of Justice of the European Communities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether laughing devices suitable for use in dolls are to be classified under heading 97.02 B (parts and accessories of dolls) or 97.03 B (other toys) of the Common Customs Tariff
Ratio Decidendi
Laughing devices suitable principally for use in dolls that are representations of human beings come within heading 97.02 B of the Common Customs Tariff.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling issued; laughing devices suitable for use principally in dolls that are representations of human beings come within heading 97.02 B of the Common Customs Tariff.
Orders
- Costs incurred by the Commission are not recoverable; costs as between the parties are for the referring court to determine.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment