Intercon v Commission (Judgment) French Text [2016] EUECJ T-632/14 (22 September 2016)
The action was admissible under Article 272 TFEU, as the applicant invoked the contractual dispute clause and the substance of the dispute concerned contractual obligations. The Commission did not exceed the audit's scope, which was within the grant agreement. Intercon failed to submit required documents and observations within contractual deadlines, and the Commission was entitled to disregard late submissions and recover unduly paid sums. The applicant's arguments were unfounded and the action was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2016] EUECJ T-632/14
- Parties
- Applicant: Intercon sp. z o.o.; Respondent: Commission européenne
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Contractual Claim Under Article 272 TFEU / Final Judgment at First Instance (general Court, Sixth Chamber)
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Seventh Framework Programme (fp7), EU Research Funding, Grant Agreements, Audit Procedures, Contractual Disputes, Procedural Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Intercon sp. z o.o.
Applicant
Commission européenne
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contractual Claim Under Article 272 TFEU / Final Judgment at First Instance (general Court, Sixth Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission exceeded the scope of the audit under the grant agreement
- 2 Whether the Commission failed to consider documents and observations submitted by Intercon
- 3 Whether the action was admissible under Article 272 TFEU despite formal deficiencies
Ratio Decidendi
The action was admissible under Article 272 TFEU, as the applicant invoked the contractual dispute clause and the substance of the dispute concerned contractual obligations. The Commission did not exceed the audit's scope, which was within the grant agreement. Intercon failed to submit required documents and observations within contractual deadlines, and the Commission was entitled to disregard late submissions and recover unduly paid sums. The applicant's arguments were unfounded and the action was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- The action is rejected.
- Intercon sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment