BECIROVIC v. CROATIA - 45370/10 (Decision) [2012] ECHR 1112 (12 June 2012)
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be based on respect for human rights and saw no reason to continue examining the application, thus striking it out of the list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] ECHR 1112
- Parties
- Applicant: Izet Becirovic; Respondent: Republic of Croatia
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Length of Civil Proceedings, Article 6 § 1 ECHR, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Izet Becirovic
Applicant
Republic of Croatia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
- 2 Whether the friendly settlement respects human rights as defined in the Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be based on respect for human rights and saw no reason to continue examining the application, thus striking it out of the list.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out of the list of cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
0 [ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> BECIROVIC v. CROATIA - 45370/10 (Decision) [2012] ECHR 1112 (12 June 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1112.html Cite as: [2012] ECHR 1112 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no . 45370/10 Izet BECIROVIC against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on June as a Committee composed of: Anatoly Kovler , President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska , Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos , judges, and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 July 2010, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Izet Becirovic , is a Croatian national, who was born in 1963 and lives in Zagreb . He was represented befo re the Court by Ms V. Pušic Milicevic , a lawyer practising in Zagreb . The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik . The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings. On 22 March and 7 May 2012 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Croatia in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 4,000 euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Croatian kuna at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. André Wampach Anatoly Kovler Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1112.html