Janos SZENTIVANSZKI and Anna SZENTIVANSZKINE ORKENYI v Hungary - 23374/07 [2010] ECHR 1796 (12 October 2010)
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be consistent with the Convention and saw no public policy reasons to continue examining the application, thus striking the case out of its list.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] ECHR 1796
- Parties
- Applicant: János Szentivánszki; Applicant: Anna Szentivánszkiné Örkényi; Respondent: Hungarian Government
- Jurisdiction
- European Union
- Procedural Posture
- Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Right to a Fair Trial, Length of Civil Proceedings, Friendly Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
János Szentivánszki
Applicant
Anna Szentivánszkiné Örkényi
Applicant
Hungarian Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to European Court of Human Rights / Decision on Friendly Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the length of civil proceedings violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
- 2 Whether the friendly settlement is consistent with human rights and public policy
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the friendly settlement between the parties to be consistent with the Convention and saw no public policy reasons to continue examining the application, thus striking the case out of its list.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- Case struck out of the list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] European Court of Human Rights You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Janos SZENTIVANSZKI and Anna SZENTIVANSZKINE ORKENYI v Hungary - 23374/07 [2010] ECHR 1796 (12 October 2010) URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1796.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 1796 [ New search ] [ Contents list ] [ Printable RTF version ] [ Help ] SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 23374/07 by János SZENTIVÁNSZKI and Anna SZENTIVÁNSZKINÉ ÖRKÉNYI against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on October 2010 as a Committee composed of: Dragoljub Popović, President, András Sajó, Kristina Pardalos, judges, and Françoise Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 May 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Mr János Szentivánszki and Mrs Anna Szentivánszkiné Örkényi, Hungarian nationals who were born in 1961 and 1963 respectively and live in Pécs. The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings to which they were parties. On 28 June 2010 and 25 August 2010 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them, jointly, EUR 8,000 (eight thousand euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Hungarian forints at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention). In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list. For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Françoise Elens-Passos Dragoljub Popović Deputy Registrar President BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/1796.html