J.P. (Order) French Text [2022] EUECJ C-521/20_CO (07 April 2022)

J.P. (Order) French Text [2022] EUECJ C-521/20_CO (07 April 2022)

The Court found the preliminary reference manifestly inadmissible because the question posed by the referring court was hypothetical and not connected to the facts of the main proceedings, as the multiple toll violations occurred on different dates and did not constitute a single continuous offence. The request failed to establish the necessary link between the interpretation sought and the actual dispute.

Citation
[2022] EUECJ C-521/20_CO
Parties
Applicant: J. P.; Respondent: B.d. S. L.
Jurisdiction
European Union
Judgment Date
07 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Reference / Order on Admissibility
Outcome
Preliminary reference declared manifestly inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Preliminary Reference, Ne Bis in Idem, Road Tolls, Proportionality, Admissibility
European Union Law Administrative Law Preliminary Reference Ne Bis in Idem Road Tolls Proportionality Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J. P.

Applicant

B.d. S. L.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Reference / Order on Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether cumulative penalties for multiple toll violations on different road sections violate the ne bis in idem principle under Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in conjunction with Directive 1999/62/EC.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the preliminary reference manifestly inadmissible because the question posed by the referring court was hypothetical and not connected to the facts of the main proceedings, as the multiple toll violations occurred on different dates and did not constitute a single continuous offence. The request failed to establish the necessary link between the interpretation sought and the actual dispute.

Court Disposition

Preliminary reference declared manifestly inadmissible.

Orders

  • The request for a preliminary ruling introduced by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich is manifestly inadmissible.