Jean-Louis Delvaux v Commission of the European Communities. (Officials) [1997] EUECJ T-142/95 (18 December 1997)

The Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate discrimination on grounds of nationality and that the Commission had provided adequate reasons for its decision regarding promotion.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1997] EUECJ T-142/95
Parties: Applicant: Jean-Louis Delvaux; Respondent: Commission of the European Communities
Jurisdiction: European Union
Procedural Posture: Staff Case / Judgment
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: Promotion, Comparative Examination of Merits, Staff Report, Statement of Reasons, Career Conditions, Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality

Employment Law EU Administrative Law Promotion Comparative Examination of Merits Staff Report Statement of Reasons Career Conditions Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Jean-Louis Delvaux

Applicant

Commission of the European Communities

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Staff Case / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 whether the applicant was discriminated against on grounds of nationality in promotion procedures
2 whether the comparative examination of merits and staff report were properly conducted
3 whether the statement of reasons was adequate

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate discrimination on grounds of nationality and that the Commission had provided adequate reasons for its decision regarding promotion.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.