Jean-Paul Seiller v European Investment Bank. (Admissibility) [2003] EUECJ T-385/00 (17 June 2003)

Jean-Paul Seiller v European Investment Bank. (Admissibility) [2003] EUECJ T-385/00 (17 June 2003)

The Court held that the contested act was a confirmatory act and therefore the application for annulment was inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] EUECJ T-385/00
Parties
Applicant: Jean-Paul Seiller; Respondent: European Investment Bank
Jurisdiction
European Union
Procedural Posture
Action for Annulment / Admissibility Decision
Outcome
application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility, Confirmatory Act, Action for Annulment
European Union Law Administrative Law Admissibility Confirmatory Act Action for Annulment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean-Paul Seiller

Applicant

European Investment Bank

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Action for Annulment / Admissibility Decision

  1. 1 Whether the contested act constitutes a confirmatory act and is therefore inadmissible for annulment proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the contested act was a confirmatory act and therefore the application for annulment was inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as inadmissible